map_boiler
04-20 09:42 AM
...just send me an alternate email id if you don't get it.
Thanks!
Thanks!
wallpaper Volvo has given the S80 line a
aquarianf
06-18 09:55 AM
I have a problem where my "Given Name" is entered as "<first name> <last name>" in my passport (India). The "Surname" is left blank. I have been in the US for 7 years now and it has never been a problem so far. I usually enter the "<last name>" in the last name column on all documents. I wonder if this will cause problems during the I485 name check stage. Any one here who can throw some light on this issue?
I realize that the question is a little weird, I appreciate any response.
Thanks
I had the same issue and I got it changed from Indian consulate NY. The whole process took around a week. You need to advertise in local newspapers which is not a big deal. Around Rs 200 in indian newpaper and $70 in US newspaper (Classified section).
I realize that the question is a little weird, I appreciate any response.
Thanks
I had the same issue and I got it changed from Indian consulate NY. The whole process took around a week. You need to advertise in local newspapers which is not a big deal. Around Rs 200 in indian newpaper and $70 in US newspaper (Classified section).
Ramba
02-25 04:22 PM
The concept of pre-approval/pre-adjudication have been practiced by USCIS since 2005. Though, it is not in their law or SOP or regulations, they are practicing now and before for ease of operation in processing the 485s. As per their current official rule, if a visa number is not immediatly available, the 485 shoul be kept in abayance (not to be processed) till VN again available. But practically it is not possible for them to follow. For example, suddenly, if DOS releases 60,000 visas in a month (like july 07 fiasco), they can not process and approve 60,000 485s in a month, if they keep those files in abayance. I think, they are still processing and pre-approving the 485s during retrogression. The concept of pre-approval in a silent internal procedure. They may pre-approve all the cases. However, they always has a right to check the applicant's eligibility for the approval of 485 at the date of approval of 485. One can not expect them not to send RFE/NOID after it is pre-approved. Unless the law changes drasticlly, it is not a easily achaivable benefit to introduce new immigrat status "pre-approved adjustment cases"for long waiting 485 folks. They clearly argue that benefit of AC21,EAD and AP itseltf a great benefit for 485 folks. There are only 3 immigrant catagory in the law. 1. Non-immingarts 2. Immigrants and 3. Pending to adjust status. Pending to adjust status it self a fluid temporary status as the stay in this status is autorized by attorney genreral. It is not a visa status like H1B or green card. In order to bring a new catagory in this status, I think they need to change the INA.
2011 for the Volvo S80 T6 yet.
LostInGCProcess
12-10 01:43 AM
You sound like a cold rock.
Have mercy, just for the tiny moment when she was giving birth to a child. If you don't know what the pain is like, may be you can ask your mom to enlighten you.
You are a jerk, get a life man!!!!!
Thanks for posting the link.
1.4.6 A pregnant inmate shall not be restrained while in labor, while giving birth, or during the post-partum recovery period, unless requested by attending medical staff or as specifically directed by the Warden. If restraints are necessary in any manner under such conditions, they should be the least restrictive type possible to remain consistent with sound security practices.
So the warden can still order restraints.
Have mercy, just for the tiny moment when she was giving birth to a child. If you don't know what the pain is like, may be you can ask your mom to enlighten you.
You are a jerk, get a life man!!!!!
Thanks for posting the link.
1.4.6 A pregnant inmate shall not be restrained while in labor, while giving birth, or during the post-partum recovery period, unless requested by attending medical staff or as specifically directed by the Warden. If restraints are necessary in any manner under such conditions, they should be the least restrictive type possible to remain consistent with sound security practices.
So the warden can still order restraints.
more...
sweet_jungle
09-08 02:39 AM
I am aware of the issue. The only thing I can take care of right now is keep track of the revisions, and I am keeping track of them. (Thanks for the headup sweet_jungle)
Is this campaign still on?
I did not see much enthusiasm on this issue.
Do people not want their files to be adjudicated or not?
Is this campaign still on?
I did not see much enthusiasm on this issue.
Do people not want their files to be adjudicated or not?
The7zen
03-09 04:13 PM
Subscription Payment Sent (Unique Transaction ID #1R189321FY253022D)
In reference to: S-5T748022M83296742
In reference to: S-5T748022M83296742
more...
transpass
08-22 01:49 PM
This Guy Oh is just like one of us.......gossip mongers!!! Guys...take it easy.....worry about things u have control over and like Sean Hannity says "Let not your heart be troubled"!!!
IMO, It ain't cool to follow Hannity dude...:p But my heart is troubled for you...:(
IMO, It ain't cool to follow Hannity dude...:p But my heart is troubled for you...:(
2010 for the Volvo S80 T6 yet.
potatoeater
04-11 10:21 AM
I reiterate what I said in my earlier post. The purpose of the post was not to start an argument. It was just an explanation of a baffling retrogression of dates.
Many people in these forums were asking bewilderingly, how can dates which were already retrogressed by eight years can go further back? Are there people around who are waiting for 8 years just to get their labors cleared? If their labors were already done, then what were they doing for 8 years before filing AOS petitions? I explained that no, nobody was waiting for all these years at the labor stage. These are new candidates utilizing old pre-approved labors. Thats all.
In fact, I predict retrogression to U level in EB2-I also. Many of these same people will now jump the queue again and switch to EB2 category.
Again, this is no judgment passing. Just an explanation of things as they stand. It is what it is.
Peace.
your immagination/calculation might be true.....so what?? Havnt we seen a lot of posting about what mischief is being done by a handful?? why do we spend our time on analysing that? IV shouldn't be a website where I log in in the morning and find what all mischief is happening or happened or will happen. There are mischief makers and let the law deal with them. we are a group of straightforward individuals who wish to concenterate on fighting the injustice of the extreme delays. If there was a mischief the USCIS is supposed to catch them and fix it. it is not allowed to delay yours/ mine just because a few others did something wrong. Please concentrate on today and tomorrow. Plan for a new line of action and we will join.
Many people in these forums were asking bewilderingly, how can dates which were already retrogressed by eight years can go further back? Are there people around who are waiting for 8 years just to get their labors cleared? If their labors were already done, then what were they doing for 8 years before filing AOS petitions? I explained that no, nobody was waiting for all these years at the labor stage. These are new candidates utilizing old pre-approved labors. Thats all.
In fact, I predict retrogression to U level in EB2-I also. Many of these same people will now jump the queue again and switch to EB2 category.
Again, this is no judgment passing. Just an explanation of things as they stand. It is what it is.
Peace.
your immagination/calculation might be true.....so what?? Havnt we seen a lot of posting about what mischief is being done by a handful?? why do we spend our time on analysing that? IV shouldn't be a website where I log in in the morning and find what all mischief is happening or happened or will happen. There are mischief makers and let the law deal with them. we are a group of straightforward individuals who wish to concenterate on fighting the injustice of the extreme delays. If there was a mischief the USCIS is supposed to catch them and fix it. it is not allowed to delay yours/ mine just because a few others did something wrong. Please concentrate on today and tomorrow. Plan for a new line of action and we will join.
more...
fatjoe
08-26 01:08 PM
Yes, they go by the receipt date, which appears on your USCIS online status - they are suppose to go by the date delivered to mail room / receipt date printed on your 797
The Receipt date is the date when they actually receive our case in a Service Center. Notice date is when it got entered into the system. I-485 Notice shows both the RD and ND. RD should be August 17 for most of us, whose cases were transferred to various Service Centers. Online status shows the ND. The only confusion here is what do they go by(may be USCIS it self not sure how to prioritize - whether on ND or RD).
Strictly speaking, if they go by ND and if the ND is after Aug-17 we may not be eligible for GC, as our(July/Aug 07 batch) cut-off dates is august-17-2007. This is what I was told by DAO when I attended the interview at the local USCIS office.
The Receipt date is the date when they actually receive our case in a Service Center. Notice date is when it got entered into the system. I-485 Notice shows both the RD and ND. RD should be August 17 for most of us, whose cases were transferred to various Service Centers. Online status shows the ND. The only confusion here is what do they go by(may be USCIS it self not sure how to prioritize - whether on ND or RD).
Strictly speaking, if they go by ND and if the ND is after Aug-17 we may not be eligible for GC, as our(July/Aug 07 batch) cut-off dates is august-17-2007. This is what I was told by DAO when I attended the interview at the local USCIS office.
hair Photo: 2011 Volvo S80View more
mannubhai
09-27 04:42 PM
My passport was renewed by Consulate of Chicago and the fields last name and first name were interchanged.
I used the miscellaneous service form. The reason i gave was other and also did not fill my name on the form. I took it to the consulate along with my old passport and showed them the error. They agreed to make a correction and then I filled in the name on the miscellaneous service form the the way i wanted it to look like.
They provided an endorsement on the second page of the passport and this should be good for travel and all other purposes. I did not need an affidavit as the old passport was used as the proof.
I believe you should be able to use the same.
I used the miscellaneous service form. The reason i gave was other and also did not fill my name on the form. I took it to the consulate along with my old passport and showed them the error. They agreed to make a correction and then I filled in the name on the miscellaneous service form the the way i wanted it to look like.
They provided an endorsement on the second page of the passport and this should be good for travel and all other purposes. I did not need an affidavit as the old passport was used as the proof.
I believe you should be able to use the same.
more...
vpadman
07-17 07:07 PM
Great work IV!!!
Thanks for your efforts.
Thanks for your efforts.
hot 09+ Volvo S80 T6 wheels
gc28262
05-11 05:35 PM
Wah! What did you see anti immigrant in my post? Can you please elaborate?
Please answer my question. You will get the answer from your reply.
You have become a citizen. What is your vested interest in pursuing this divisive discussion ?
Please answer my question. You will get the answer from your reply.
You have become a citizen. What is your vested interest in pursuing this divisive discussion ?
more...
house Volvo S80 T6 AWD. basic info. spec rating
yingxiong
07-17 10:21 PM
Thanks so much IV team and each member!
tattoo 2008 Volvo S80 T6 Turbo AWD
transpass
08-22 09:15 AM
Why does his profile have same date for everthying .............
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/member.php?u=18915
I don't think one's profile has anything to do with one's posting. May be he did not want to share his profile. In any case, if someone puts a believable profile, but posts some fake story, does that make the post a genuine one?
Ching is posting just what he experienced at the CIS office. Having said that, I am not saying what he posted has absolute truth to it. But on the otherhand, the way CIS does things, would anyone be surprised? With all the past experience we have had with CIS and DOS, anything is quite possible. Yeah, now it's not only frustrating to deal with CIS's ways of working, but also even more frustrating when we encounter posts like this whether they are true or not...
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/member.php?u=18915
I don't think one's profile has anything to do with one's posting. May be he did not want to share his profile. In any case, if someone puts a believable profile, but posts some fake story, does that make the post a genuine one?
Ching is posting just what he experienced at the CIS office. Having said that, I am not saying what he posted has absolute truth to it. But on the otherhand, the way CIS does things, would anyone be surprised? With all the past experience we have had with CIS and DOS, anything is quite possible. Yeah, now it's not only frustrating to deal with CIS's ways of working, but also even more frustrating when we encounter posts like this whether they are true or not...
more...
pictures Volvo S80 2.8 T6 (A)
h1techSlave
02-25 11:29 AM
I think this idea has some traction.
Now on the other side, I am wondering why IV core hasn't yet posted their opposition to this idea.
Now on the other side, I am wondering why IV core hasn't yet posted their opposition to this idea.
dresses 2008 Volvo S80 T6
obelix
02-24 12:06 PM
Hi All,
I recently had my last name added on my Passport. I just submitted for updating the SSN. Couple of questions:
1. Does anybody know if I need to run the payroll and also file the taxes with new name on the SSN once it's been updated. I still need to file my 2009 taxes.
2. Do I need to inform USCIS about this or it should be OK if I just submit the new name on I-129 when I apply for renewal later this year.
3. I maintain H1B expiring Sept 2010. I might need to travel to India before expiration with the current visa. Do I need to do anything to avoid name confusion at POE?
Please share your experience. Appreciate your time.
Thanks
I recently had my last name added on my Passport. I just submitted for updating the SSN. Couple of questions:
1. Does anybody know if I need to run the payroll and also file the taxes with new name on the SSN once it's been updated. I still need to file my 2009 taxes.
2. Do I need to inform USCIS about this or it should be OK if I just submit the new name on I-129 when I apply for renewal later this year.
3. I maintain H1B expiring Sept 2010. I might need to travel to India before expiration with the current visa. Do I need to do anything to avoid name confusion at POE?
Please share your experience. Appreciate your time.
Thanks
more...
makeup Technical specification
kosars
08-14 01:15 PM
This is in reply to sam2006 above. I had an LUD on my I140 on 7/28/07 but my application was mailed to TSC directly.
girlfriend Volvo S80 T6 Awd. Volvo S80 T6
ragz4u
04-20 08:53 AM
...hope it helps.
Great job IV team! Thanks!!!
Could you please resend it again at shrey@immigrationvoice.org?
Thanks
Great job IV team! Thanks!!!
Could you please resend it again at shrey@immigrationvoice.org?
Thanks
hairstyles VOLVO S80 T6 SE Lux
belmontboy
04-15 09:10 PM
Oh how considerate of you !!!
You think the same but dont say it out loud
Sorry if you misunderstood.
I have no sympathy for you
You think the same but dont say it out loud
Sorry if you misunderstood.
I have no sympathy for you
newbie2020
03-02 12:44 PM
bump this thread to keep the interest up and running...
seekerofpeace
08-21 01:56 PM
What do u mean by genuine RFEs....
My RFE was to prove status from 1999 to 2003..show I-20/EAD/F1/H1 etc....
Regardless of RFEs what I meant was preadjudication is a myth....anyone can get an RFE whether he is preadjudicated or not....
U can get RFEs for the silliest of reasons...and once you get that RFE it does not matter if it is genuine or not....you have to respond and your case gets delayed.
I don't understand why members in this forum are so hopeful that if they are preadjudicated then it is a matter of time (and soon) they will get green.
SoP
My RFE was to prove status from 1999 to 2003..show I-20/EAD/F1/H1 etc....
Regardless of RFEs what I meant was preadjudication is a myth....anyone can get an RFE whether he is preadjudicated or not....
U can get RFEs for the silliest of reasons...and once you get that RFE it does not matter if it is genuine or not....you have to respond and your case gets delayed.
I don't understand why members in this forum are so hopeful that if they are preadjudicated then it is a matter of time (and soon) they will get green.
SoP
No comments:
Post a Comment